Virtual Paperboy
User login
Pesticide-icide? Council hears call for ban
It was standing room only in council chambers Monday night as Diana Daghoher of Prevent Cancer Now and Susanne Belanger of the Canadian Cancer Society presented before council on the possibility of adopting a pesticide ban bylaw. The “Pesticide free” flag waving crowd of about 15 residents heartily supported the duo as they explained their mission: why Rossland should adopt a pesticide ban bylaw, the best way to build that bylaw and the economic effects of doing so.
The group’s request for council was threefold. First they would like Rossland to pass a municipal bylaw prohibiting the use of cosmetic pesticides in town; secondly they would like the city to support provincial legislation banning the sale of the product; and third they would like city support for the group’s educational efforts. Backing up their efforts was a petition which was presented to council containing 250 signatures in support of a pesticide ban bylaw.
An educational component on both the stated detriments of cosmetic pesticides as well as the benefits of healthy non-chemical alternatives is to be a major part of their battle against pesticides. Bringing in speakers and using existing locals familiar with the area as well as a possible garden tour of chemical free gardens could also be included in the program The delegation claim, however, that education the public on the risks and alternatives is not going far enough and that “education alone in other areas has reduced pesticide use by about 24%. When education programs were combined with a bylaw a 50% to 90% reduction has been seen.”
As we nudge closer to spring the group is now planning a series of information sessions and workshops along with printed support materials. Part of the support the group is seeking from the City of Rossland is assistance with this education program. The Canadian Cancer Society has existing literature to promote; however, they do not have the money to print it. Help from the city in this case was requested in the form of assistance with printing. Currently, the group holds fundraisers such as their upcoming event at Red Mountain in March.
To get any potential bylaw on pesticide use passed the group will first need to get city council on side as there have been claims of scientific backing from both the pro and anti-pesticide use camps.
“I realize not everyone believes pesticides are a cause on health problems. However, we believe there is enough evidence to adopt a bylaw... We endorse the 'better-safe-than-sorry' principle.”
Among the statistics provided was a “recent Canadian Family Physicians report in which of 104 studies looked at, 83 were accepted. On breast cancer five of six tests found positive associations with pesticide, on pancreatic cancer, three of three tests found positive associations, on non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma 23 out of 27 found positive associations and on leukemia, brain, and stomach and kidney cancer positive associations with pesticides were also found. This may not be rock solid science as scientists always want to do more research,” stated Daghofer, “but we think it’s certainly enough evidence to move forward, and that’s what we’re urging council to do.”
In an effort to dispel the objection that putting pesticides on your own lawn is your own business and if people don’t like it stay off your lawn they provided some additional information.
“One of the greatest problems with pesticides is that they are not site-specific,” explained Belanger. “The statistics show that between 50 and 100 percent of pesticides end up in the soil and water and less than 0.3 percent actually target disease and insects. They don’t stop at the pests. They migrate through the water, soil and air.”
A major factor for any municipality to consider before adopting any bylaw is how such a ban would affect the local economy. While the group did not have statistics on how many lawn care or other companies in town were currently using pesticides, they cited examples from Toronto and Halifax which both adopted pesticide ban bylaws in 2001. “In Halifax the number of lawn care companies increased 53% in the five years following the ban and the size of companies grew,” cited Belanger. “At last report available in 2006, the Toronto Lawn Care industry was at its healthiest ever, five years after the ban.”
Locally, the only place to purchase pesticides had been at Pro Hardware. Pro Hardware, however, has not been selling the products for the last year. Adding a different angle to the story, their reasons for not selling the product are purely financial.
“We’re not going to be selling it because it costs us $250 per year for every staff to have a licence to sell it. To have everyone certified would cost us in the range of $1,000 per year,” noted Pro Hardware owner, John Greene. In addition to the cost of the licence, Greene also noted that he would pay his staff the hours to study, prepare for and take the test as well which could be hundreds of dollars more in wages. “We simply don’t sell $1,000 worth of the product so it’s not worth it for us to do it anymore.”
In addition to regulations causing him to lose that business he sees that as having a ripple effect for his store as well as other Rossland stores. “People who do want to buy it now have to drive all the way out to Columbia Valley Greenhouses. That’s not particularly green, and when they are down there they do their other shopping as well which isn’t good for us or other shops in Rossland either. I’m not in favour of a ban--that’s too much big government. People should be able to make their own decisions.”
A number of the municipal and provincial bans on the use of pesticides across the country have included clauses exempting golf courses from the bans. Cary Fisher of Redstone explained that they, along with most other golf courses in the country, have already been ahead of the curve with integrated pest management plans that are endorsed by the Audubon society. “We’re governed by the Canadian Government, the BC government and the Royal Canadian Golf Course Association. In order to have gotten our plan approved, we had to put together an integrated pest management plan which has a much higher degree of standards than any sort of public use of pesticides. Generally speaking, public use of pesticides [involves] someone at the store telling you to read the label. Our certified pesticide applicators have a licence with the province of BC and have to adhere to our integrated pest management plan with a whole list of protective measures included. We use non-chemical products as much as possible and really only use a very limited amount of pesticides on our course.”
Due to the immediate use and exposure of people at a golf course, they have stricter regulations again than the agricultural industry and many pesticides used in the agricultural world are not permitted at golf courses. A number of strict conditions and standards are also in place at Redstone for use of pesticides. For example, they have a 15 metre zone around all ponds and creeks where they do not apply pesticides. Redstone also uses minimal pesticides and only in small site specific locations when necessary. Fisher noted that Redstone doesn't blanket coat the golf course but rather targets small trouble spots only when necessary, as little as two or three times a year. When they do apply pesticides, they follow strict regulations such as applying them only under certain barometric pressure to reduce airborne spreading.
“I think there are better ways to manage minimal pesticide use in the town of Rossland. We would like to see a bylaw that managed pesticide use rather than an outright ban. We would promote education and awareness around their use,” added Fisher.
Mayor Greg Granstrom’s thoughts on the presentation were that “there is competing science on both sides of this issue. One of the first things we have to do is look at the numbers and get some real data before we move forward with any bylaw.”
If council were to adopt a pesticide bylaw, a motion to do so would first have to come back before council to be discussed and voted upon. For now the matter will be back before council in two weeks' time as is the normal protocol for delegations. At that time council will discuss how they will deal with the information now received from the delegation.
- Login or register to post comments




- Facebook Like
- Google Plus One
- Tweet Widget
Other News Stories
-
by Dr. Brenda Gill on Jan 31 2012
-
by Alex Atamanenko MP on Jan 30 2012
-
by Erin Perkins on Jan 29 2012
-
by Contributor on Jan 28 2012
-
by Boundary Sentinel on Jan 27 2012
-
1 day 12 hours ago
-
1 day 12 hours ago
-
2 days 22 hours ago
-
3 days 3 min ago
-
3 days 8 hours ago

Comments
Pesticide use in golf
REDSTONE PESTICIDES
William H. Gathercole's et al daily harassment of professionals
K.I.S.S. (Keep it Simple.....)
RESPONSE TO : Pesticide-icide ? Council hears call for ban.
Just say no to NoRahg