Virtual Paperboy
User login
Avatar a wonderful ride through an alien world
Being privileged enough in a small town to see the new film Avatar on its opening weekend at our hometown theatre, the Gem, I couldn’t resist writing a review of this amazing film. What is most impressive is the use of new technology that allows director James Cameron to seamlessly move from real-life filming to animation. While the Gem didn’t have the 3D equipment for viewing the film in the intended format, even the 2D version is a wonder to watch.
Cameron created a whole world in the film – a world with jungles, unusual creatures, and diverse plant and insect species. The only time you feel you might be on a movie lot is in the humans’ zone where they have built a base for their mining production. While the plot is a typical good vs. evil storyline with romance included, Cameron made the story intriguing, and the world you explore through the eyes of the avatar keeps you fully engaged throughout the two-and-a-half hours.
Avatar is a 2009 American-British epic 3-D science fiction film written and directed by Cameron, starring Sam Worthington, Zoë Saldaña, Sigourney Weaver and Stephen Lang. The film begins in 2148 and focuses on an epic conflict on Pandora, an inhabited Earth-sized moon of Polyphemus, one of three fictional gas giants orbiting Alpha Centauri A. On Pandora, human colonists and the sapient humanoid indigenous inhabitants of Pandora, the Na'vi, engage in a war over the planet's resources and the latter's continued existence. The film's title refers to the remotely controlled, genetically engineered human-Na'vi bodies used by the film's human characters to interact with the natives. (Wikipedia)
James obviously modeled the storyline on real-world events. The mining corporation is intent on accessing resources but is being blocked by the indigenous people. This mimics situations that arise in third world countries today where corporations intent on expanding their bottom line, as the head of the army contingent in the movie says, “if there’s one thing shareholders hate worse than bad press, it’s a bad quarterly report,” try diplomacy to talk indigenous people out of their assets, and then act with force if the diplomacy doesn’t work. The not so subtle comments by army folk in the movie referring to the indigenous people as “terrorists” and the mission they are about to engage in as a “shock and awe” campaign are jabs that are not missed by most.
But the not to miss part of this film is beyond a doubt the technology. The creation of an entire world that is hard to distinguish as animation is unbelievable. The only thing better than seeing this film would be to see it in 3D where the plants that light up when you touch them, or the foliage of the jungle would enclose you in a way that you can’t see in 2D. The Na’vi themselves have humanoid characteristics and they could easily be people in costume the way that the animation is done. Muscles move, eyes show intelligence, and it is easy to believe they are real. If you are hesitating – go, if only to see the wonderful world Cameron created. The film is an enjoyable ride in another world.
Avatar had been in development since 1994 by Cameron, who wrote the 114-page script for the film. Filming was supposed to take place after the completion of Titanic, and the film would have been released in 1999, but, according to Cameron, "technology needed to catch up" with his vision of the film. In early 2006, Cameron developed the final script, the language, and the culture of Pandora. He has stated that if Avatar is successful, two sequels to the film are planned. (Wikipedia)
The film was produced by Lightstorm Entertainment and distributed by 20th Century Fox. It premiered in London on December 10, 2009, and was released in the United Kingdom on December 17, 2009, one day prior to its theatrical release in the United States. (Wikipedia)
The film was released in traditional 2D and 3D formats, along with an IMAX 3D release in selected theaters. Avatar is officially budgeted at $237 million; some estimates put the cost at $280 – $310 million to produce and an estimated $150 million for marketing. The film is being touted as a breakthrough in terms of filmmaking technology, for its development of 3D viewing and stereoscopic filmmaking with cameras that were specially designed for the film's production. (Wikipedia)
Opening to critical acclaim, it grossed an estimated $27 million on its opening day and an estimated $77 million domestically its opening weekend. Worldwide, the film grossed an estimated $232,180,000 its opening weekend, the ninth largest opening-weekend gross of all time, and the largest for a non-franchise, non-sequel and original film. (Wikipedia)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avatar_(2009_film)
Other Stories
-
Contributor
-
Boundary Sentinel
-
Boundary Sentinel
-
Nik Green
-
Mona Mattei
-
13 hours 33 min ago
-
2 days 1 hour ago
-
2 days 11 hours ago
-
2 days 19 hours ago
-
3 days 23 hours ago
Comments
I have to say I laughed out
I have to say I laughed out loud when Nik compared the plot of Avatar to Ferngully. Even though I haven't seen that fine kids' film, I know what he means: it's hard being green.
Before I go into Grinch mode, I'll start by saying I agree with Mona and Nik about the visual splendor of Avatar. A pivotal moment in my movie-going life was Terminator 2--another Cameron film, of course. I saw that one three times in a week. He took special effects to a whole new level then and he's done it again here. This movie is spectacular.
The story, however, is deeply (shallowly?) underwhelming and left me with the sort of brain ache most Hollywood fables almost always do.
Even though the film's theme is ostensibly critical of environmental rape, in the end the 'villain' ends up being one over-the-top and out-of-control bad ol' boy with a GW Bush accent. By identifying with the peacenik Blue Men and Women, we, as audience, find ourselves absolved of the crimes of our species. Convenient.
So what's the take home message here? Should we follow the lead of the film's protagonist and turn against our own industrial society? Should we do what he does and start blowing up the guts of industry? Obviously not. The real message of Avatar is 'have a nice moment of feeling better than the enemy-who-is-clearly-us and then hop into our cars and toodle off home'. In short: we get to have our cake and eat it too.
That said, even though the film's budget would have been better spent on preserving a few million square kilometres of rain forest for all eternity, it's worth seeing purely as a feast for the eyes. What does that say about my own ethics? Nothing I want to think too deeply about this close to Christmas.--ed.
3D
We here at the Sentinel like our movies so much that while Mona saw Avatar in 2D in Grand Forks, I went to Vancouver and took in the 3D experience. The afterglow of experiencing this new technology has me feeling more like I've returned from a vacation than a film.
I found the 3D experience made the 3 hour runtime evaporate faster than Tiger Wood's sponsors and left me wanting more. The effect makes the viewer look around the screen more and the film becomes so engaging it feels more like trip then just a viewing.
As a filmmaker I quickly dissected the simple plot as essentially being identical to Ferngully, but that didn't stop me from enjoying the show immensely. The environments in the film are truly astounding and the overall impact of the action scenes is spectactular in 3D.
Avatar is one of two titans that are cleaning up the awards currently, the other being Kathryn Bigelow's tense drama The Hurt Locker which I also viewed this past week. Actually I saw it twice and will do so again. It to is a superb film that should not be missed.