End prohibition of marijuana, say B.C. mayors

End prohibition of marijuana, say B.C. mayors

Tax and regulate say B.C. mayors calling for the end of prohibition of marijuana to lower violence in their communities.

Grand Forks mayor Brian Taylor joined his voice to the call that came out last week from the eight mayors of Vancouver, Burnaby, North Vancouver City, Vernon, Armstrong, Enderby, Lake Country and Metchosin. The joint letter from the mayors called on leaders at all levels of government to take responsibility for marijuana policy, end prohibition and tax the drug.

“We see a seemingly endless stream of anti-marijuana law enforcement initiatives in our communities, yet marijuana remains widely and easily available to our youth. Based on the evidence before us, we know that laws that aim to control the marijuana industry are ineffective and, like alcohol prohibition in the U.S. in the 1920s, have led to violent unintended consequences,” they said in the letter delivered to B.C. Premier Christy Clark, Opposition leader Adrian Dix and John Cummins.

Not only is the prohibition costly to maintain for enforcement and harm reduction, the mayors gave a compelling case to regulate and tax the drug.

“…the province’s massive illegal marijuana trade drives organized crime in BC and throughout the Pacific Northwest. The Organized Crime Agency of BC estimates that organized crime groups control 85 percent of BC’s marijuana trade, which the Fraser Institute estimates is worth up to $7 billion annually. U.S. federal prosecutors have identified BC-based drug gangs that control the marijuana trade as “the dominant organized crime threat in the Northwest,”” continued the letter.

The West Kootenay / Boundary regions have long joked about their underground economy in marijuana and how it is the main source of income for many residents. Taylor agrees with setting up strict regulations around marijuana and to look at taxation, noting that larger urban areas have effectively been pushing the sophisticated large operators out of their municipalities creating increased crime problems for rural areas.

“I thought we’d be swayed by morality over time, but in point of fact it’s come down to simple money,” said Taylor. “I think the attraction is taxation, so regulate and tax satisfies both sides: the need for more revenue and the regulate side means that we can keep it away from children. Having it used as an adult enjoyment or medication, and offer those concerned about the sky falling some assurance that the regulation side will not allow this to become chaos.”

Several of the mayors involved in this letter campaign lead communities that have adopted motions supporting Stop the Violence BC - a coalition of legal, law enforcement and health experts seeking to change cannabis laws.

Although not endorsed formally by Grand Forks council, Taylor said the call for regulation and taxation of marijuana is underway across the Kootenay / Boundary and was a topic at the Association of Kootenay Boundary Local Governments’ April meeting.

“Someone suggested, well, if we could tax marijuana at a rural level we could solve some of our problems – the crowd came alive and cheered,” Taylor laughed. “It was a part of a discussion about economics.”

Taylor referred to the growing government movement to change laws in the United States as further evidence that legalization of the drug is long overdue.

“This (issue) will be going before the people of California, Washington and Oregon, and seven other states in November and it’s running about 67 percent in the polls to initiate a system of regulation and taxation similar to the wine industry,” Taylor explained.

They will be licencing grow operations in these states if their referendums pass, and the key, said Taylor is that the taxes will be municipal noting that this will benefit regions and municipalities.

 “What we have right now is a hidden economy within our rural areas,” said Taylor. “We can’t see the growers out there that are cultivating and making money on the side selling their pot in smaller quantities.”

“The best that we can hope for here is that (our provincial leaders) challenge the federal government’s stranglehold on this,” Taylor added. “It’s economic development, it’s health care on the medical marijuana side. We should be past the “is it going to happen” stage, and starting to plan for the image of post-prohibition British Columbia.”

This drug, banned from prescribing options for physicians in 1935, may now be a solution for local governments to shore up their tax revenues in a time of limited economic growth – an irony that what has been illegal for nearly 80 years could now become a taxpayer’s saviour.

Comments

The only reason the

The only reason the government would decriminalize it, is because they see dollar signs, there is no other reason. They have never had our best interests in mind, why start now. I'm not sure which is better, having organized crime with control over it, or legal organized crime (our government) with control. I do agree with most of what's been said here, but it seems you all think there is nothing wrong with inhaling smoke into ones lungs. Pot might not be as socially destructive as alcohol, or as physically harmful as tobacco, but it's not completely harmless, come on, inhaling any smoke is not benign. I stopped smoking it years ago because it started causing anxiety with me after I would smoke it. Not to mention, right away I noticed how much clearer my mind was, my dreaming returned, I stopped hacking up phlegm, & I had a lot more money in my pocket. If people really think that decriminalizing & regulating it will eliminate children from getting there hands on it, might I point out how well that works will tobacco, & alcohol. There is only one thing motivating these government chumps.......TAX REVENUE

hey

You can vaporize your weed or tobacco you don't have to combust it. Some people shouldn't be smoking, some people cannot handle drugs and get anxiety etc. I think kids shouldn't start smoking till atleast 18. If our medical system was a legit one and didn't depend on a uptight doctor to sign the medical card, this would be a non issue. Once we get a proper medical system everything else will fall into place. Marijuana alone is better than 90% of everything prescribe by doctors. They even have a new strain of cannabis which produces small amount of thc( the phychoactive drug in cannabis) and around 15% cbd(the main medical ingedient in cannabis).. There is more to cannabis than just thc, there is other active cannabinoids and terpenes that also help many things.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabidiol

http://terpenes.weebly.com/

Brownies?

(Hear ya about dreams, productivity, ...)

End the Prohibition of Marjuana

I feel its time we take a serious look at this issue,

UPDATE

The Botany of Cannabis (9:04)

The Botany of Cannabis (9:04) copy and paste good information

speak up West Kootenay Mayors

It would be nice to see our West Kootenay mayors speak up in favour of this movement. 

Legalizing Marijuana

Annual deaths related to firearms in the United States: 29,000. Annual deaths related to prescription drugs: 32,000. Annual deaths related to alcohol: 85,000. Related to tobacco: 435,000. Marijuana? 0. Not a single case of death ever recorded in the United States, or even the world has been attributed to the use of marijuana.

So, what this statement tells me is that it is ok to legally consume or use substances that absolutely will kill you but it is illegal to use marijuana which has absolutely no recorded history of death from it's use, world wide. Makes a whole lot of sense to me. NOT.

I personally would much rather be around someone who is high on pot than someone drunk. A man comes home from the bar drunk, he beats his wife and kids and kicks his dog. That same man comes home from smoking weed with friends, he raids the cupboard and refridgerator and falls asleep on the couch. And we all know this scenario is based on truth. How many maariages have been destroyed and families ripped apart from the over consumption of alcohol ?

The most lethal substances( tobbaco, and alcohol) are available to anyone over the age of 19 in BC, and yet, the most benign ( marijuana) is illegal to everyone.

Marijuana has many benfits health wise.It reduces pain, relieves siezures, increases appetite, relieves anxiety and is even know to reduce the spread of cancer and even kill certain cancer cells. Tobbaco certainly has absolutely no benefits.

Prohibition of marijuana not only encourages organized crime but it also makes criminals out of honest, hard working tax payers that just want to relax after work, smoke a joint and eat a pizza or two.

The prohibition on marijuana is a complete and utter failure. More people smoke pot now than they ever had and the laws will never stop it's production or use so just legalize it and get on with life. :)

It's hard to imagine that

It's hard to imagine that anyone really cares about keeping pot illegal any more. What's lacking is simply principled politicians who are willing to change the laws to put them in harmony with the current thinking/cultural consensus on this very tired old subject (dude).

But what's the motivation for a self-serving politician/party?

Really, a right wing party should legalize pot given that prohibition is essentially socialist in that it attempts to create public virtue through social engineering--more an NDP approach than a Conservative one. But we're not likely to see Stephen Harper in the pro-pot camp any time soon. Which only shows that he's not much of a conservative! I guess he'd rather see those hearty entrepreneurs, the Hell's Angels, pump up the economy than act consistently with, say, the 'hands off private people's lives' approach he used wrt the gun registry.

...It's all very Alice In Wonderland, isn't it?

On the other hand, there's

On the other hand, there's the argument that we should legalize pot if we don't like pot smokers because legal dope would leave them with nothing to talk about...lol

End prohibition of marijuana

As we've seen it has many medicinal uses that can't be patended so the drug manufacturers will not allow governments to end prohibition. And yes corporations do run governments.

Or organized crime

There's also no telling how much or if organized crime pull the strings of certain politicians.  How would we know if certain individuals that made large donations to candidates or political parties might have criminal interests in continuing an illicit drug trade?  Or which politician might have thinly veiled threats thrown their way?  Big Pharma wouldn't have anywhere as much to lose as organized crime by the legalization of marijuana.  After all, even right now, medical marijuana is easily accessible, so legalizing it would have little or no additional effect on pharmaceutical companies.

Not quite, ever heard of

Not quite, ever heard of Marinol, that's a patented pharmaspeudical synthetic of THC. And there are negative affects of smoking reefer, albeit not as harmful as alcohol & tobacco. Chronic use with males, has shown decreased number of sperm & sperm motility. And use with women has shown nonovulatory menstrual cycles, in which mentration is not preceded by the release of an ovum. All sorts of psychomotor activity and performance are negatively affected by marijuana use. I've seen first hand what they call amotivational syndrome, a term used to describe a loss of effectiveness & reduced capacity to accomplish conventional goals as a result of chronic use. And we all know about the memory issues related to smoking weed. I too would rather be around someone stoned on pot than someone who is drunk, but pot is not all good, that's all I'm getting at. As I grew up, I lost the desire to get drunk or stone, and I feel it has improved my life significantly, as well as saved me a lot of money. Personally, I don't care if they decriminalize it or not. It's not going to eliminate a single criminal, they'll just find something else illegal to do. And nothing good can come out of the government wanting to get involved either.